Legal & Ethics Center
CLARITY BY DESIGN
The documents below were built to be reviewed, not just displayed.
This page is designed for reviewers, evaluators, and decision-makers who need to verify the legal structure behind our systems. Every policy, disclosure, and compliance safeguard listed below was written with precision to support SBIR review, licensing approval, and public sector alignment. These documents are not for display. They exist to make trust verifiable.
PUBLIC ACCESS DOCUMENTS
<|> Public Legal Disclosures
These foundational legal policies apply to all users and visitors of the IntegraStream WPS website. Each document is published transparently to clarify platform use, data privacy, accessibility, ethical AI structure, and legal boundaries. They are permanently available through our footer and updated regularly for regulatory compliance.
<|> Privacy Policy
The Privacy Policy outlines in full detail how IntegraStream WPS LLC collects, stores, uses, and safeguards all forms of user interaction and identifiable behavior. It explicitly discloses how consent is obtained, how session data is tracked, and how no information is ever sold, repurposed, or transferred to third parties without legal basis and user clarity. This document includes protections aligned with both U.S. (CCPA/CPRA) and international (GDPR) frameworks, and clarifies the company's position on passive vs active data capture. It reinforces that no user behavior is used for profiling, psychological inference, or third-party analytics pipelines. Instead, all structural behavior is anonymized and system-aligned to preserve clarity, privacy, and user autonomy. This policy is structured to meet the expectations of SBIR reviewers, public sector stakeholders, and institutional evaluators who require verified safeguards around identity, behavior logging, and longitudinal consent.
<|> Terms of Use
The Terms of Use defines the legal foundation by which all visitors, users, evaluators, and partners may access and interact with the IntegraStream WPS digital environment. It establishes the conditions of entry, platform usage boundaries, intellectual property rights, and behavioral responsibilities of any individual or institution engaging with the system. The document clearly outlines what constitutes authorized use, including distinctions between personal insight exploration and licensed enterprise integration. It provides limitations of liability, dispute resolution pathways, and non-commercial use boundaries to protect both the platform and the user. This agreement is carefully structured to shield against misuse, signal manipulation, or inappropriate repurposing of outputs as clinical, diagnostic, or third-party evaluation tools. It is written with legal reviewers and SBIR procurement teams in mind, ensuring that your system’s legal container is structurally sound, institutionally compatible, and built to withstand both commercial scrutiny and federal deployment.
<|> Cookie Policy
The Cookie Policy explains in exact detail how web tracking, session storage, and browser-based analytics are implemented across the IntegraStream WPS website. It discloses every form of passive data interaction, including session cookies, performance monitoring tools, and behavior-triggered elements used solely for website functionality and user experience. No cookies are used for behavioral profiling, targeted advertising, or third-party remarketing. This document clearly differentiates between essential cookies required for system navigation and optional cookies that users may explicitly opt out of. It also reinforces that all cookie behavior is fully aligned with current regulatory frameworks, including California’s CPRA and the European Union’s GDPR standards for informed consent. The policy includes a plain-language breakdown of cookie categories, retention timeframes, and the exact logic behind user permission controls. It is written for both legal compliance and institutional trust, ensuring that any public sector, education, or SBIR reviewer can clearly assess the website’s transparency in digital data handling.
<|> Accessibility Statement
The Accessibility Statement affirms IntegraStream WPS LLC’s full commitment to building a structurally inclusive digital environment. It documents the principles, design decisions, and interface behaviors implemented to ensure equal access for all users. This includes those navigating with assistive technologies, users with sensory impairments, or individuals requiring alternative interaction formats. The statement is not decorative. It is a legally grounded declaration of compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Section 508 accessibility requirements, and WCAG 2.1 AA-level criteria. It details how text clarity, contrast ratios, keyboard-only navigation, and semantic markup are structurally embedded into every page and system output. It also includes a roadmap for continuous accessibility improvement, tied to stakeholder feedback, live audits, and federal compliance standards. Written for educators, public sector reviewers, and accessibility officers, this document establishes IntegraStream’s commitment to clarity not only as a functional value but as a civil and structural right.
<|> AI Ethics Disclosure
The AI Ethics Disclosure outlines the foundational principles that govern how all IntegraStream WPS systems are designed, deployed, and evaluated. It explicitly states that no platform developed by IntegraStream is intended for psychological assessment, mental health analysis, emotional profiling, or predictive behavior scoring. Every system operates within structural boundaries that treat input data as symbolic logic rather than as indicators of pathology, personality, or emotion. The document discloses how decision outputs are generated through non-clinical scaffolding, and how adaptive behavior is limited by fixed structural rules rather than opaque neural retraining. It clarifies that none of the system’s generative functions are built to simulate therapy, interpret cognition, or engage in behavioral manipulation. This ethics statement also reinforces the company’s rejection of black-box AI models that alter themselves without oversight. Written for evaluators, grant reviewers, and public sector compliance officers, this document serves as both a philosophical boundary and a legal shield, demonstrating that IntegraStream’s work honors the ethical limits of psychometric AI through design, transparency, and accountability.
<|> Disclaimer of Advice
The Disclaimer of Advice provides a clear legal and structural separation between the guidance offered through IntegraStream WPS systems and any form of therapeutic, medical, or psychological counsel. It affirms that no module, system, or tool within the IntegraStream ecosystem is intended to diagnose, treat, or make claims about mental health, emotional wellness, or clinical conditions. This includes but is not limited to identity outputs, goal prompts, alignment reflections, or performance pathways. The disclaimer also prohibits interpretation of any results as professional recommendations or behavioral interventions. All clarity tools, including those built into user-facing workflows, are designed for operational and structural alignment only. This document ensures that no evaluator, user, or institutional reviewer confuses system logic with human therapy. It was written to withstand scrutiny from SBIR legal officers, federal program reviewers, and public sector compliance auditors who require clear delineation between behavior support tools and medical systems. By publishing this disclaimer prominently, IntegraStream reinforces its commitment to ethical clarity and responsible technology deployment.
<|> IP Copyright Protection Notice
The Copyright and IP Protection Notice defines the full scope of legal ownership, authorship, and proprietary control surrounding all platforms, outputs, system logic, and framework designs developed by IntegraStream WPS LLC. It establishes that every aspect of the company’s behavioral clarity architecture, including its identity maps, structural alignment flows, and AI-enhanced outputs, is original intellectual property protected under applicable copyright and trade secret law. This document prohibits the reproduction, modification, reverse engineering, or unauthorized use of any component. That includes EvoGlyphs, coaching signal formats, and clarity loop systems. It also asserts that all trademarks, naming conventions, interface logics, and coaching scaffolds are bound by legal claim and cannot be imitated, mirrored, or commercially adapted without explicit written license. This protection extends to outputs generated by users through licensed tools and systems, ensuring no derivative use can be misrepresented or repackaged. The notice is written to hold under legal review, licensing negotiation, and public sector audit. It reinforces IntegraStream’s position as the sole architect and rightful owner of its structural performance technologies.
SBIR + TRUST EVALUATION FILES
<|> Evaluator & Licensing Documents
These documents are designed for SBIR reviewers, federal evaluators, licensing officers, and public sector legal teams. Each file is structured to demonstrate system readiness, compliance alignment, behavioral safeguards, and ethical deployment boundaries. They define exactly how our systems may be reviewed, licensed, or evaluated for institutional use.
<|> Data Ethics and AI Training Policy
The Data Ethics and AI Training Policy explains exactly how IntegraStream WPS selects, filters, and applies structured prompts to shape the behavior of its AI systems without using personal, clinical, or unconsented user data. This document makes clear that all training occurs through controlled, simulated inputs that mirror behavioral patterns symbolically rather than capturing emotional or psychological traits. No actual user conversations, identity logs, or private data are ever used to retrain or influence the live system. Instead, structural logic and clarity scaffolds are calibrated using methodical test cases and tightly governed simulations. The policy outlines how bias is reduced through design constraints and signal boundaries, ensuring that outputs are shaped by architecture rather than user profiling. It also details the safeguards built into adaptive systems so that all learning behavior is bounded by fixed ethics logic and cannot drift or self-alter in deployment environments. For SBIR reviewers, institutional evaluators, and public sector leads, this document provides high-resolution trust by showing exactly how the AI was shaped, what data was excluded, and why structural fidelity always comes first.
<|> Technical Accessibility Addendum
The Accessibility Addendum provides a detailed technical supplement to the primary Accessibility Statement. It is specifically intended for institutional reviewers, compliance officers, and public sector accessibility audits. This document outlines the exact design mechanisms used to ensure the IntegraStream WPS interface meets or exceeds ADA guidelines, Section 508 federal requirements, and WCAG 2.1 AA-level compliance standards. It includes implementation details on keyboard-only navigation, high-contrast visual design, scalable font rendering, semantic layout structure, and screen reader compatibility. It also confirms that symbolic visual elements, including EvoGlyphs and clarity scaffolds, are accompanied by structured textual alternatives to support accessibility across all sensory modalities. The document exists not just to claim alignment with standards but to prove it through design transparency. For SBIR grant reviewers, educational institutions, and federal evaluators, this addendum offers clear assurance that accessibility was engineered into the system from the foundation level rather than appended as an afterthought.
<|> Structural Use Disclosure
The Structural Use Disclosure defines how outputs from IntegraStream WPS systems, including EvoGlyphs, coaching reflections, alignment maps, and structural feedback loops, may and may not be used in professional, institutional, or evaluative contexts. It draws a clear legal boundary between clarity signals and clinical or diagnostic interpretation. This document affirms that while system outputs may support decision-making, personal insight, or team recalibration, they must not be used to evaluate psychological fitness, assess mental health status, or substitute for licensed coaching or therapeutic guidance. It prohibits the use of clarity outputs in hiring decisions, academic evaluations, disciplinary proceedings, or behavioral assessments. It also disallows unauthorized extraction, relabeling, or repurposing of system outputs for integration into external software, documentation workflows, or third-party analysis. This document exists to protect the user, the evaluator, and the integrity of the system itself. For SBIR reviewers, institutional leads, and federal compliance officers, it provides clear parameters for how the system's structural outputs must be interpreted and applied.
<|> IP Licensing Request Form
The IP Licensing Request Form is a formal intake document created for institutions, public sector contractors, SBIR reviewers, and strategic partners who wish to explore licensing any of the proprietary clarity systems developed by IntegraStream WPS LLC. It captures essential information required to begin a structured and protected licensing conversation. This includes organizational role, intended use case, anticipated user count, system of interest, duration of proposed access, and whether the request is for public deployment or internal use. By requiring this form prior to issuing any licensing agreement, IntegraStream ensures that all licensing discussions begin within a clearly defined legal boundary. This approach protects both the requesting party and the intellectual property holder by establishing intent, usage scope, and ethical safeguards upfront. The form is downloadable as a PDF and can also be submitted digitally. It is structured for ease of use by government contractors, educational institutions, SBIR partners, and enterprise leads who require formal entry into the licensing process.
<|> Evaluator FAQ
The Evaluator FAQ is a legal and operational summary designed specifically for grant reviewers, SBIR evaluators, government agencies, and public sector decision-makers who require immediate clarity before entering deeper technical or legal review. It addresses the most commonly asked questions about the structure, purpose, limitations, and compliance posture of IntegraStream WPS systems. Topics covered include clinical boundaries, data usage, identity protection, structural ethics, system ownership, and deployment readiness. This document does not rely on vague marketing claims. It presents legally verifiable statements written in clear language for immediate evaluator understanding. Its purpose is to reduce friction, accelerate institutional review, and establish trust before walkthroughs or technical presentations take place. For federal grant officers, compliance teams, or institutional stakeholders who need to quickly understand whether the system is structurally sound and legally aligned, the Evaluator FAQ serves as a trusted starting point.
<|> Licensing Terms for AI Systems
The Licensing Terms for AI Systems define the formal legal structure under which any organization, contractor, coach, or institution may access, deploy, or resell systems developed by IntegraStream WPS LLC. This document outlines the boundaries of usage, the scope of rights granted, the responsibilities of the licensee, and the constraints placed on modification, redistribution, or reinterpretation of system outputs. It ensures that all licensed use maintains the structural integrity, symbolic coherence, and ethical standards of the original systems. These terms prohibit use cases that would distort, repurpose, or embed the systems into diagnostic, emotional profiling, or medical contexts. The document includes clauses for scope limitation, renewal structure, enforcement logic, and termination conditions in the event of misuse or non-compliance. It is written to withstand institutional and federal audit, align with SBIR Phase II expectations, and support licensing clarity across public sector, academic, and enterprise use cases. By anchoring each license in a clearly defined legal and ethical framework, IntegraStream protects the integrity of its clarity architecture and those who rely on it.
<|> Public Sector Disclaimer & Evaluator Terms
The Public Sector Disclaimer and Evaluator Terms is a specialized legal document written for SBIR reviewers, public agency evaluators, and institutional decision-makers assessing the IntegraStream WPS system for potential partnership, grant consideration, or deployment. It defines the scope of review, clarifies the non-clinical status of all outputs, and outlines exactly how system demonstrations, walk-throughs, or evaluator materials should be interpreted. This document prevents mischaracterization of the system’s function by making it clear that all outputs are structurally symbolic and are not to be used for psychological profiling, therapy, or decision enforcement within a government context. It also establishes that system participation in pilot programs, SBIR phases, or internal review is protected under non-diagnostic logic and clarity ethics protocols. The terms define what constitutes appropriate evaluator access, how feedback is handled, and what protections exist for both parties during structured evaluation. For public sector agencies, academic pilots, or defense partners reviewing this technology, the document provides an upfront legal container that ensures both trust and appropriate use.
“Compliance is not an obligation. It’s a design choice.”
NEED A REVIEW WALKTHROUGH?
We support evaluators and reviewers directly.
Every policy on this page was written with care, shaped by firsthand experience, and structured to meet the standards of serious review. If your team is evaluating our systems for SBIR compliance, licensing, or institutional use, we’re available for direct walkthroughs and legal clarification.